Patrick

My feedback

  1. 537 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  74 comments  ·  Feedback » Integrations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Patrick commented  · 

    I think this was a good idea to not integrate with Slack since you so most of the chat functions Slack is capable of right in tawk. Commerce and analytics and attribution integration should be a higher priority!

  2. 216 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  6 comments  ·  Feedback » Improvements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Patrick commented  · 

    It would be nice to let them minimize the window without closing chat altogether. Will save time if they decide they want to chat.

  3. 891 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  72 comments  ·  Feedback » New features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Patrick commented  · 

    This is a very common feature in almost every ticketing and chat system out there

  4. 115 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    18 comments  ·  Feedback » New features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Patrick commented  · 

    This is great. Is there any way to incorporate SMTP integration for our mail servers into this so the email can come from support@yourcompany.com vs [funiquieidentifier]@tickets.tawk.to?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Patrick commented  · 

    this is a good idea.

  5. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Feedback » Improvements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Patrick shared this idea  · 
  6. 20 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Feedback » Improvements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi there David,

    Yes, it won’t work as you are trying to use the ticketing system in a way that it’s not supposed to be used yet.
    We have had discussions that Visitors should be able to create tickets as well as Agents do but currently we only support Agents creating tickets.

    We’re thinking about this but are not sure when development on this will start, though.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Patrick commented  · 

    Having POP/SMTP integration to ensure that the email doesn't come from "via tawk.to" in the extended header would be great to make the solution seamless

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Patrick commented  · 

    When a ticket is created by an agent, the user gets an email. That email should be from something like "support@yourdomain.com". The customer should have the option to reply to this email and have their response added to the ticket.

    Also, a new email to that address should open a ticket that agents can work on.

  7. 519 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    47 comments  ·  Feedback » Integrations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Patrick commented  · 

    FYI, we would LOVE the ability to integrate with Zapier and pass info into a hidden field of the initial chat so that the operator can get that info from our systems (i.e., this lead comes from Google AdWords). Our systems handle the second part. Zapier is a logical move to cut down on your dev work for every little integration out there. Just have to be able to receive the data.

    Patrick supported this idea  · 
  8. 445 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    74 comments  ·  Feedback » New features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi!

    Thank you for the suggestion.

    Currently the only way is to ban by IP, but in this case the widget won’t appear for that user as well.
    To ban by IP, please go to Admin – Ban List – click Ban IP button.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Patrick commented  · 

    this is a good idea

  9. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Feedback » New features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Patrick shared this idea  · 
  10. 21 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Feedback » New features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Patrick commented  · 

    clearly this feature would be most useful for a public facing knowledge base.

    Patrick shared this idea  · 
  11. 73 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  8 comments  ·  Feedback » New features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Patrick commented  · 

    This is a good idea so that customers can review their open tickets and follow up.

    Patrick supported this idea  · 
  12. 30 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi there Matthias,

    We see that quite a few of you are asking for this feature and we would love to give it to you but the problem is that to get this information, our Widget has to be integrated with the specific platform which us used as the backbone for the website. We have a few now and will expand further.

    What is the platform that you use so we know for what to build the integration first?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Patrick commented  · 

    We'd be happy with a hidden, pre-populated field because our application does a find and replace on whatever we tell it to so we can populate the field ourselves. We just need the field hidden so it's not viewable to the user and something to write in. :-)

  13. 470 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    68 comments  ·  Feedback » Integrations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Patrick commented  · 

    I think it would be even better if Tawk supported Google Tag Manager so then you could put whatever scripts you wanted on the site without having to make the Tawk staff implement all of them that are out there

  14. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Feedback » Improvements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Patrick shared this idea  · 
  15. 36 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  3 comments  ·  Feedback » New features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Patrick commented  · 

    Yes please. This will allow Tawk users to implement products as subdomains without using third party URLs. This will be particularly helpful when the front facing knowledge base comes out. support.yourcompany.com will go over much better than sending customers to a third party URL and risk never getting them back.

  16. 476 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  30 comments  ·  Feedback » New features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Patrick shared this idea  · 
  17. 10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Feedback » New features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Patrick shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base